Difference between revisions of "Vlyt en Kunst"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| − | The company was founded and managed by [[J.T. van der Chys]], | + | The company was founded and managed by [[J.T. van der Chys]], with [[P.A. Ley]] as a marketing agent and later manager perhaps, and [[J.J. de Kock]] as secretary. [[C.E. Boniface]] now became the leading artistic presence, who wrote, translated and undoubtedly staged some works for the company. |
[[Vlyt en Kunst]] is first mentioned by this name only in 1834, though the company itself claimed (in 1835) that it had been in existence for 3 years by then (i.e. had been founded in 1833), which leads Bosman (1928, p. 321) to argue that it had flowed directly out of an earlier company, [[Door Yver Bloeit de Kunst]] (''floreat'' 1833), particularly since [[J.T. van der Chys]] had played the same management role in the earlier company. The company was active till 1838, when two opposing groups formed within the company - one led by De Kock. By the end of 1838 this internal strife had caused the break-up of the company. | [[Vlyt en Kunst]] is first mentioned by this name only in 1834, though the company itself claimed (in 1835) that it had been in existence for 3 years by then (i.e. had been founded in 1833), which leads Bosman (1928, p. 321) to argue that it had flowed directly out of an earlier company, [[Door Yver Bloeit de Kunst]] (''floreat'' 1833), particularly since [[J.T. van der Chys]] had played the same management role in the earlier company. The company was active till 1838, when two opposing groups formed within the company - one led by De Kock. By the end of 1838 this internal strife had caused the break-up of the company. | ||
Revision as of 06:03, 8 September 2016
Vlyt en Kunst (1834 to 1838) was a private Dutch amateur theatre company in Cape Town.
Contents
History
The company was founded and managed by J.T. van der Chys, with P.A. Ley as a marketing agent and later manager perhaps, and J.J. de Kock as secretary. C.E. Boniface now became the leading artistic presence, who wrote, translated and undoubtedly staged some works for the company.
Vlyt en Kunst is first mentioned by this name only in 1834, though the company itself claimed (in 1835) that it had been in existence for 3 years by then (i.e. had been founded in 1833), which leads Bosman (1928, p. 321) to argue that it had flowed directly out of an earlier company, Door Yver Bloeit de Kunst (floreat 1833), particularly since J.T. van der Chys had played the same management role in the earlier company. The company was active till 1838, when two opposing groups formed within the company - one led by De Kock. By the end of 1838 this internal strife had caused the break-up of the company.
Performances
The company performed in Dutch, with most of the productions taking place in what was known as the Liefhebbery Toneel ( i.e. Amateur Theatre in English) , though they also occasionally used the African Theatre.
Plays performed included:
Het Schandmerk, of De Twee Galeiboeven (Boirie, Carmouche and Poujol), Het Dorp aan de Grenzen, of De Hollanders en de Brabanders (J. van Lennep), Robert Maxwell, of De Offerdood (Von Kotzebue), De Wonderdoctor (Molière), Clasius, of Het Proces om een Komedielootjie (Boniface), De Vaandrig (Schroder), Valmont de Saint Priest, of De Schipbreukeling (Van Haemstede), Castor and Pollux (Boniface) Nog Net Zoo (Boniface), .
De Burger Edelman (Molière).
.
[TH, JH]
Sources
F.C.L. Bosman, 1928. Drama en Toneel in Suid-Afrika, Deel I: 1652-1855. Pretoria: J.H. de Bussy. [1]: pp. 320-342.
P.J. du Toit, 1988. Amateurtoneel in Suid-Afrika. Pretoria: Academica
Go to ESAT Bibliography
Return to
Return to South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc
Return to South African Stage Plays
Return to The ESAT Entries
Return to Main Page
