Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia"
(Created page with "Launched on January 15, 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger it is a free, collaboratively edited, and multilingual Internet encyclopedia supported by the non-profit Wikimedia Fo...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The Encyclopaedia is seen as unscientific, flawed and even dangerous by many prominent scholars and academics. As the entry on Wikipedia itself states it: "The open nature of Wikipedia has led to various concerns, such as the quality of writing, the amount of vandalism and the accuracy of information. Some articles contain unverified or inconsistent information." These concerns are constantly being debated. However, it can nevertheless be immensely useful as a research tool, providing quick (even if suspect of unsubstantiated) information on just about everything. | The Encyclopaedia is seen as unscientific, flawed and even dangerous by many prominent scholars and academics. As the entry on Wikipedia itself states it: "The open nature of Wikipedia has led to various concerns, such as the quality of writing, the amount of vandalism and the accuracy of information. Some articles contain unverified or inconsistent information." These concerns are constantly being debated. However, it can nevertheless be immensely useful as a research tool, providing quick (even if suspect of unsubstantiated) information on just about everything. | ||
| − | [[ESAT]] also employs the Wiki software platform utilised by Wikipedia, and many of the entries in ESAT acknowledge Wikipedia as a source, or refer readers to related Wikipedia entries. | + | [[ESAT]] also employs the Wiki software platform utilised by Wikipedia, and many of the entries in [[ESAT]] acknowledge Wikipedia as a source, or refer readers to related Wikipedia entries. |
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Revision as of 08:19, 2 December 2012
Launched on January 15, 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger it is a free, collaboratively edited, and multilingual Internet encyclopedia supported by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Its 23 million articles, have been written collaboratively by volunteers around the world. Almost all of its articles can be edited by anyone with access to the site,and it has about 100,000 active contributors.
The Encyclopaedia is seen as unscientific, flawed and even dangerous by many prominent scholars and academics. As the entry on Wikipedia itself states it: "The open nature of Wikipedia has led to various concerns, such as the quality of writing, the amount of vandalism and the accuracy of information. Some articles contain unverified or inconsistent information." These concerns are constantly being debated. However, it can nevertheless be immensely useful as a research tool, providing quick (even if suspect of unsubstantiated) information on just about everything.
ESAT also employs the Wiki software platform utilised by Wikipedia, and many of the entries in ESAT acknowledge Wikipedia as a source, or refer readers to related Wikipedia entries.
Sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia
Go to South African Theatre/Bibliography
Return to
Return to South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc
Return to The ESAT Entries
Return to Main Page
