Difference between revisions of "African Theatre"

From ESAT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The name [[African Theatre]] can be used in a variety of ways, falling roughly into two categories.
+
The term [[African Theatre]] is really quite a difficult one to define, and it has been used in numerous ways over the years - falling roughly into two broad categories:
  
= As a generic term =
+
(1) as a generic term, equivalent to [[African Drama]] and/or [[African Performance]] (see also [[Drama]] and [[Performance]])
  
 +
(2) as the name of a specific theatre [[Venue|venue]] called [[The African Theatre]].
 +
  
== For theatre in and theatre of [[Africa]] ==
+
= As a generic term =
  
The term [[African Theatre]] is really quite a difficult one to define, and it has been used in numerous ways over the years.
+
There are a number of difficulties with the idea of using the umbrella term [[African]] to discuss theatrical, cinematic, media and performance activities from, in and on the continent.  
  
In the first place the term can be used as a generic reference to "theatre in and theatre of Africa". Also used may be [[African Theater]], [[African Drama]], or [[African Performance]] (or any combination of these). Alternately it may also be [[Theatre]], [[Drama]] and/or [[Performance]] '''in''' Africa.
+
The first and perhaps most important question to ask, given the variety,  size and cultural diversity of the African continent is a question one may ask about "[[African Theatre]], [[African Film]], [[African Media]] or [[African Performance]], is "What ''Africa'' are you talking about?"  It is one often asked by commentators, one of the more critical being the Nigerian born author and academic [[Kole Omotoso]] (See for example [[Yvette Hutchison|Hutchison]] and [[Kole Omotoso|Omotoso]]. 1995.)  The fact is that there are a multitude of "Africas", each with its own particular cultural, social, political, economic, ethical and other characteristics - and ''ipso facto'', its own traditions, conventions and functions of and for theatrical performance. (See the entry on [[Africa]])
  
This already points a number of difficulties with the idea of using the umbrella term African to discuss theatre from, in and on the continent.  
+
The second point has to do with the rather dated notion that Africa did not have a tradition of ''theatre'' (or the ''idea'' of theatre),  and that many African languages did not have a word for it.  This stance assumes that theatre - as a cultural practice - was brought to the continent in the period of colonization by European settlers. But this belief is patently absurd, for it totally ignores the nature of [[theatre]] and [[performance]] as we see them today, as well as the growing archaeological evidence. For example, it is widely believed that the first human beings almost certainly came from the continent, and these peoples (e.g. the [[San]] in [[Southern Africa]]) had a long narrative and dance tradition, as evidenced by age-old rock paintings containing drawings and other physical indications. In addition, the northern regions, notably  Egypt, abutted the [[European]] continent and yet are part of Africa. Accommodating this perspective in any discussion of African Theatre is imperative, though at times difficult.  
  
The first and perhaps most important observation to make, given the variety,  size and cultural diversity of the African continent is a question one may ask about "[[African theatre]], namely "What ''Africa'' are you talking about?"  It is one often asked by a number of commentators, one of the more critical being the Nigerian born author and academic [[Kole Omotoso]] (See for example [[Yvette Hutchison|Hutchison]] and [[Kole Omotoso|Omotoso]]. 1995.) The fact is that there are a multitude of "Africas", each with its own particular cultural, social, political, economic, ethical and other characteristics - and ''ipso facto'', its own traditions, conventions and functions of and for theatrical performance.  
+
The third difficulty has to do with the definition of the term [[African]] and where the lines are drawn between the indigenous and the imported theatrical and other events as it were: E.g the so-called indigenous performance forms and plays, as opposed to performances and texts  based on [[Western]] or [[Eastern]] principles, forms and texts (e.g. Sophocles, Shakespeare, Moliere etc - and derivative work in their styles), in its turn again opposed to performances and texts produced or manufactured ''outside'' Africa, and then merely brought to and shown in Africa. Which of this work is to be considered [[African]]?
  
The second obeservation has to do with the rather dated notion that Africa did not have a tradition of ''theatre'' (or the  ''idea'' of theatre)and that many African languages did not have a word for it.  This stance assumes that theatre - as a cultural practice - was brought to the continent in the period of colonization by European settlers. But this belief is this is patently absurd, for it totally ignores the nature of [[theatre]] and [[performance]] as we see them today, as well as the growing archaeological evidence. For example, it is widely believed that the first human beings almost certainly came from the continent, and these peoples (e.g. the [[San]] in [[Southern Africa]]) had a long narrative and dance tradition, as evidenced by age-old rock paintings containing drawings and other physical indications. In addition, the northern regions, notably  Egypt, abutted the [[European]] continent and yet are part of Africa.
+
However, despite these difficulties with the generic term, it is still widely used, usually in one of two broad meanings:
  
However,  there is a long history of the erasure of African achievement in favour of [[European]] benevolence and beneficence, it is has long been a fundamental part of the skewed history of the arts and cultures of the continent, an attitude that to this day still requires energy and vigilance to oppose, reinterpret and rectify.
+
== For theatre in and theatre of [[Africa]] ==
  
(For more on these points, see [[African]] and [[African theatre]])
+
Used as a generic reference to "theatre in and theatre of Africa", it . Also used may be [[African Theater]], [[African Drama]],  or [[African Performance]] (or any combination of these). Alternately it may also be [[Theatre]], [[Drama]] and/or [[Performance]] '''in''' Africa. 
  
 +
== To refer to an [[African]] style or form of theatre ==
  
Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Themes|South African Theatre Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
+
In the second place as a reference to a style or form of theatre or performance deriving from Africa. In this case the  difficulties pointed out become particularly acute. 
  
Return to [[Main Page]]
+
'''For more information'''
  
== For an [[African]] style or form of theatre ==
+
See for instance entries under [[Africa]],  [[African]], etc
 
 
 
 
In the second place as a reference to a style or form of theatre deriving from Africa. 
 
 
 
Both these uses are somewhat contested, but nevertheless often found and used.
 
 
 
== For more information ==
 
  
 
Banham, Rotimi, Igweonu (2011),  
 
Banham, Rotimi, Igweonu (2011),  
Line 38: Line 34:
 
Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/757261/African-theatre
 
Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/757261/African-theatre
  
= As the name of a theatre =
+
= As the name of a theatre company=
  
There are a large number of companies and theatres utilising this name, in and outside South Africa.  
+
There are a large number of companies utilising this name, in and outside South Africa, as any web search will show.  
  
 +
= As the name of a theatre venue=
 +
 +
There have likewise been many [[Venue|venues]] with this name, in and outside South Africa. 
  
== [[The African Theatre]], Cape Town==
 
 
Also known officially by its Dutch name as "Di [[Afrikaansche Schouwburg]]". 
 
  
See '''[[The African Theatre]]'''
 
  
=== Sources ===
+
== [[The African Theatre]], Cape Town (1800-1835)==
  
[[F.C.L. Bosman]], 1928; [[Jill Fletcher]], 1994:21-28;  [[P.J. du Toit]],  1988 [TH, JH]
+
The best known and one of the most influential in the early evolution of the theatre and performance practice in South Africa has been [[The African Theatre]] in Cape Town. Also known officially by its [[Dutch]] name as "[[Di Afrikaansche Schouwburg]]", it was designed by [[Sir George Yonge]] and opened in 1800, closing as a theatre in 1835. The building still exists in Cape Town, a listed historic building now known as [[St Stephen's Church]].   
  
=== For more information ===
+
'''For a full discussion, see the entry under [[The African Theatre]]'''
  
http://ancestry24.com/st-stephens-church-ngk/
+
= Return to =
  
=== Return to ===
 
  
 +
Return to [[South African Theatre/Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
  
 
Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Venues|South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc ]]
 
Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Venues|South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc ]]

Latest revision as of 16:15, 21 November 2023

The term African Theatre is really quite a difficult one to define, and it has been used in numerous ways over the years - falling roughly into two broad categories:

(1) as a generic term, equivalent to African Drama and/or African Performance (see also Drama and Performance)

(2) as the name of a specific theatre venue called The African Theatre.


As a generic term

There are a number of difficulties with the idea of using the umbrella term African to discuss theatrical, cinematic, media and performance activities from, in and on the continent.

The first and perhaps most important question to ask, given the variety, size and cultural diversity of the African continent is a question one may ask about "African Theatre, African Film, African Media or African Performance, is "What Africa are you talking about?" It is one often asked by commentators, one of the more critical being the Nigerian born author and academic Kole Omotoso (See for example Hutchison and Omotoso. 1995.) The fact is that there are a multitude of "Africas", each with its own particular cultural, social, political, economic, ethical and other characteristics - and ipso facto, its own traditions, conventions and functions of and for theatrical performance. (See the entry on Africa)

The second point has to do with the rather dated notion that Africa did not have a tradition of theatre (or the idea of theatre), and that many African languages did not have a word for it. This stance assumes that theatre - as a cultural practice - was brought to the continent in the period of colonization by European settlers. But this belief is patently absurd, for it totally ignores the nature of theatre and performance as we see them today, as well as the growing archaeological evidence. For example, it is widely believed that the first human beings almost certainly came from the continent, and these peoples (e.g. the San in Southern Africa) had a long narrative and dance tradition, as evidenced by age-old rock paintings containing drawings and other physical indications. In addition, the northern regions, notably Egypt, abutted the European continent and yet are part of Africa. Accommodating this perspective in any discussion of African Theatre is imperative, though at times difficult.

The third difficulty has to do with the definition of the term African and where the lines are drawn between the indigenous and the imported theatrical and other events as it were: E.g the so-called indigenous performance forms and plays, as opposed to performances and texts based on Western or Eastern principles, forms and texts (e.g. Sophocles, Shakespeare, Moliere etc - and derivative work in their styles), in its turn again opposed to performances and texts produced or manufactured outside Africa, and then merely brought to and shown in Africa. Which of this work is to be considered African?

However, despite these difficulties with the generic term, it is still widely used, usually in one of two broad meanings:

For theatre in and theatre of Africa

Used as a generic reference to "theatre in and theatre of Africa", it . Also used may be African Theater, African Drama, or African Performance (or any combination of these). Alternately it may also be Theatre, Drama and/or Performance in Africa.

To refer to an African style or form of theatre

In the second place as a reference to a style or form of theatre or performance deriving from Africa. In this case the difficulties pointed out become particularly acute.

For more information

See for instance entries under Africa, African, etc

Banham, Rotimi, Igweonu (2011),

Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/757261/African-theatre

As the name of a theatre company

There are a large number of companies utilising this name, in and outside South Africa, as any web search will show.

As the name of a theatre venue

There have likewise been many venues with this name, in and outside South Africa.


The African Theatre, Cape Town (1800-1835)

The best known and one of the most influential in the early evolution of the theatre and performance practice in South Africa has been The African Theatre in Cape Town. Also known officially by its Dutch name as "Di Afrikaansche Schouwburg", it was designed by Sir George Yonge and opened in 1800, closing as a theatre in 1835. The building still exists in Cape Town, a listed historic building now known as St Stephen's Church.

For a full discussion, see the entry under The African Theatre

Return to

Return to South African Theatre/Terminology and Thematic Entries

Return to South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc

Return to The ESAT Entries

Return to Main Page