Difference between revisions of "African Theatre"

From ESAT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(30 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The name [[African Theatre]] can be used in a variety of ways, falling roughly into two categories.  
+
The term [[African Theatre]] is really quite a difficult one to define, and it has been used in numerous ways over the years - falling roughly into two broad categories:
 +
 
 +
(1) as a generic term, equivalent to [[African Drama]] and/or [[African Performance]] (see also [[Drama]] and [[Performance]])
 +
 
 +
(2) as the name of a specific theatre [[Venue|venue]] called [[The African Theatre]].  
 +
  
 
= As a generic term =
 
= As a generic term =
  
In the first place as a generic reference to "theatre in and theatre of Africa". Aslo sused may be African Drama, African drama and Theatre/ African theater,, or African Performance. Alternately it may also be theatre, drama or performance in Africa.   
+
There are a number of difficulties with the idea of using the umbrella term [[African]] to discuss theatrical, cinematic, media and performance activities from, in and on the continent.
 +
 
 +
The first and perhaps most important question to ask, given the variety,  size and cultural diversity of the African continent is a question one may ask about "[[African Theatre]], [[African Film]], [[African Media]] or [[African Performance]], is "What ''Africa'' are you talking about?"  It is one often asked by commentators, one of the more critical being the Nigerian born author and academic [[Kole Omotoso]] (See for example [[Yvette Hutchison|Hutchison]] and [[Kole Omotoso|Omotoso]]. 1995.)  The fact is that there are a multitude of "Africas", each with its own particular cultural, social, political, economic, ethical and other characteristics - and ''ipso facto'', its own traditions, conventions and functions of and for theatrical performance. (See the entry on [[Africa]])
 +
 
 +
The second point has to do with the rather dated notion that Africa did not have a tradition of ''theatre'' (or the  ''idea'' of theatre),  and that many African languages did not have a word for it.  This stance assumes that theatre - as a cultural practice - was brought to the continent in the period of colonization by European settlers. But this belief is patently absurd, for it totally ignores the nature of [[theatre]] and [[performance]] as we see them today, as well as the growing archaeological evidence. For example, it is widely believed that the first human beings almost certainly came from the continent, and these peoples (e.g. the [[San]] in [[Southern Africa]]) had a long narrative and dance tradition, as evidenced by age-old rock paintings containing drawings and other physical indications. In addition, the northern regions, notably  Egypt, abutted the [[European]] continent and yet are part of Africa. Accommodating this perspective in any discussion of African Theatre is imperative, though at times difficult.
 +
 
 +
The third difficulty has to do with the definition of the term [[African]] and where the lines are drawn between the indigenous and the imported theatrical and other events as it were: E.g the so-called indigenous performance forms and plays, as opposed to performances and texts  based on [[Western]] or [[Eastern]] principles, forms and texts (e.g. Sophocles, Shakespeare, Moliere etc - and derivative work in their styles), in its turn again opposed to performances and texts produced or manufactured ''outside'' Africa, and then merely brought to and shown in Africa.  Which of this work is to be considered [[African]]?
 +
 
 +
However, despite these  difficulties with the generic term, it is still widely used, usually in one of two broad meanings:
 +
 
 +
== For theatre in and theatre of [[Africa]] ==
 +
 
 +
Used as a generic reference to "theatre in and theatre of Africa", it . Also used may be [[African Theater]], [[African Drama]], or [[African Performance]] (or any combination of these). Alternately it may also be [[Theatre]], [[Drama]] and/or [[Performance]] '''in''' Africa.   
  
In the second place as a reference to a style or form of theatre deriving from Africa 
+
== To refer to an [[African]] style or form of theatre ==
  
Both these uses are somewhat contested, but nevertheless often found and used.  
+
In the second place as a reference to a style or form of theatre or performance deriving from Africa. In this case the  difficulties pointed out become particularly acute. 
  
 +
'''For more information'''
  
== For more information ==
+
See for instance entries under [[Africa]],  [[African]],  etc
  
 
Banham, Rotimi, Igweonu (2011),  
 
Banham, Rotimi, Igweonu (2011),  
Line 16: Line 34:
 
Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/757261/African-theatre
 
Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/757261/African-theatre
  
 +
= As the name of a theatre company=
  
 +
There are a large number of companies utilising this name, in and outside South Africa, as any web search will show.
  
= As the name of a theatre =
+
= As the name of a theatre venue=
 
 
 
 
== [[The African Theatre]], Cape Town==
 
 
Also known officially by its Dutch name as '''Di [[Afrikaansche Schouwburg]]'''. 
 
  
In fact, the theatre had a variety of names over the years. Thus it was often fondly referred to simply as "'''The Theatre'''", or as “'''the [[Cape Town Theatre]]'''” by the English, while the Dutch called it the “'''[[Zuid-Afrikaansche Schouwburg]]'''” - especially after 1829 -  and the “'''[[Kaapsche Schouwburg]]'''”.)
+
There have likewise been many [[Venue|venues]] with this name, in and outside South Africa.
  
  
It was the first proper stone built European style theatre to be built in South Africa and one of the the oldest existing such theatrical structures in the Southern Hemisphere. The theatre was constructed on the Boeren Plein ("Farmers Square") or Hottentot's Square (This is now called Riebeeck Square and the building still stands there) and between  1801-1839 it served as a theatre, and from 1840 onwards as a Dutch Reformed church (today known as the [[St. Stephen's Church]]). The building is still pretty much as it was, except for the ornamentation. It originally had no pit, only a balcony and richly ornamented boxes. However this soon changed as a pit was added in 1804. The theatre had no foyer, and the stage (still there) was small, with two doors and dressingrooms behind (now the vestry). Below the theatre was a number of warehouses and shops, still there today and still in use. Designed and built by the extravagant Governor  [[Sir George Yonge]] in 1800, it had been inspired by a succesful performance of ''[[Taste]]'' in the [[Barracks Theatre]] and in response to a request  by a number of citizens, led by one [[Henry Murphy]], to found an English/Dutch Private Theatre by subscription in Cape Town. It was planned to operate on a subscription-only basis, with Yonge himself being one of the 24 initial partners, and catered equally for English and Dutch. The Governor pushed through the project in the face of much criticism and opposition. However, when the theatre was on the eve of opening with a performance of a Shakespeare play by November 1800, a Commission of Inquiry into Sir George Yonge's affairs and his subsequent recall to England postponed it all. However, the theatre finally opened its doors early in September 1801 and in October 1801 presented its first production, Shakespeare’s [[Henry IV]] pt. 1 - a performance which ran for a week. According to a report by  Lady [[Anne Barnard]] on 16 October, the event opened with an address to Apollo, written by [[Mrs Somers]]  and spoken by [[Dr Somers]], followed by the play - apparently a dull play, but with scenes "very well done".  The theatre was run as a charitable venture and had a committee headed by the Governor, with [[Dr Somers]], [[John Pringle]] and most probably the original petitioners ([[Henry Murphy]] and his signatories, including a large number of Dutch burghers). The treasurer was [[Joseph Bray]]. In line with the British policy at the time to win the support of the Dutch, the shares in the venture were apparently equally divided between the English and Dutch, and the plan was to alternate plays in English and Dutch. On occasion German plays were also done - a tradition of German performance still extant in Cape Town today. (See: [[German Theatre in South Africa]]) For the next 30 years or so hosted most of the major productions in Cape Town, except for the Circuses and equestrian shows, and the occasional plays in the [[Barracks Theatre]]. After the opening of the [[Liefhebbery Tooneel]] (sic) in 1825, it was used primarily by English groups and gradually it fell into the hands of a single owner ([[John Thos. Buck]]). In the face of a growing anti-theatrical feeling among the citizens in the Cape it was eventually sold in March 1839 and then converted into a church for freed slaves, to the disgust of the citizenry, who stoned the building. Hence the current name: [[St Stephens Church]].  In 199* a performance of Chickin' **** (starring [[Jonathan Pienaar]]*) was held in the church in order to raise funds for the restoration of the building and in 2002-2003 [[Die Burger]], a Cape Town Afrikaans newspaper, set about raising the funds for a full resotration, with the help of the artistic community in the city. A key figure here was [[Martiens van Bart]]. By 2010 the warehouses and shops below the theatre were again being used commercially, as was the theatre itself. 
 
  
== Sources ==
+
== [[The African Theatre]], Cape Town (1800-1835)==
  
[[F.C.L. Bosman]], 1928; [[Jill Fletcher]], 1994:21-28;  [[P.J. du Toit]],  1988 [TH, JH]
+
The best known and one of the most influential in the early evolution of the theatre and performance practice in South Africa has been [[The African Theatre]] in Cape Town. Also known officially by its [[Dutch]] name as "[[Di Afrikaansche Schouwburg]]", it was designed by [[Sir George Yonge]] and opened in 1800, closing as a theatre in 1835. The building still exists in Cape Town, a listed historic building now known as [[St Stephen's Church]].   
  
== For more information ==
+
'''For a full discussion, see the entry under [[The African Theatre]]'''
  
http://ancestry24.com/st-stephens-church-ngk/
+
= Return to =
  
== Return to ==
 
  
 +
Return to [[South African Theatre/Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
  
 
Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Venues|South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc ]]
 
Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Venues|South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc ]]

Latest revision as of 16:15, 21 November 2023

The term African Theatre is really quite a difficult one to define, and it has been used in numerous ways over the years - falling roughly into two broad categories:

(1) as a generic term, equivalent to African Drama and/or African Performance (see also Drama and Performance)

(2) as the name of a specific theatre venue called The African Theatre.


As a generic term

There are a number of difficulties with the idea of using the umbrella term African to discuss theatrical, cinematic, media and performance activities from, in and on the continent.

The first and perhaps most important question to ask, given the variety, size and cultural diversity of the African continent is a question one may ask about "African Theatre, African Film, African Media or African Performance, is "What Africa are you talking about?" It is one often asked by commentators, one of the more critical being the Nigerian born author and academic Kole Omotoso (See for example Hutchison and Omotoso. 1995.) The fact is that there are a multitude of "Africas", each with its own particular cultural, social, political, economic, ethical and other characteristics - and ipso facto, its own traditions, conventions and functions of and for theatrical performance. (See the entry on Africa)

The second point has to do with the rather dated notion that Africa did not have a tradition of theatre (or the idea of theatre), and that many African languages did not have a word for it. This stance assumes that theatre - as a cultural practice - was brought to the continent in the period of colonization by European settlers. But this belief is patently absurd, for it totally ignores the nature of theatre and performance as we see them today, as well as the growing archaeological evidence. For example, it is widely believed that the first human beings almost certainly came from the continent, and these peoples (e.g. the San in Southern Africa) had a long narrative and dance tradition, as evidenced by age-old rock paintings containing drawings and other physical indications. In addition, the northern regions, notably Egypt, abutted the European continent and yet are part of Africa. Accommodating this perspective in any discussion of African Theatre is imperative, though at times difficult.

The third difficulty has to do with the definition of the term African and where the lines are drawn between the indigenous and the imported theatrical and other events as it were: E.g the so-called indigenous performance forms and plays, as opposed to performances and texts based on Western or Eastern principles, forms and texts (e.g. Sophocles, Shakespeare, Moliere etc - and derivative work in their styles), in its turn again opposed to performances and texts produced or manufactured outside Africa, and then merely brought to and shown in Africa. Which of this work is to be considered African?

However, despite these difficulties with the generic term, it is still widely used, usually in one of two broad meanings:

For theatre in and theatre of Africa

Used as a generic reference to "theatre in and theatre of Africa", it . Also used may be African Theater, African Drama, or African Performance (or any combination of these). Alternately it may also be Theatre, Drama and/or Performance in Africa.

To refer to an African style or form of theatre

In the second place as a reference to a style or form of theatre or performance deriving from Africa. In this case the difficulties pointed out become particularly acute.

For more information

See for instance entries under Africa, African, etc

Banham, Rotimi, Igweonu (2011),

Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/757261/African-theatre

As the name of a theatre company

There are a large number of companies utilising this name, in and outside South Africa, as any web search will show.

As the name of a theatre venue

There have likewise been many venues with this name, in and outside South Africa.


The African Theatre, Cape Town (1800-1835)

The best known and one of the most influential in the early evolution of the theatre and performance practice in South Africa has been The African Theatre in Cape Town. Also known officially by its Dutch name as "Di Afrikaansche Schouwburg", it was designed by Sir George Yonge and opened in 1800, closing as a theatre in 1835. The building still exists in Cape Town, a listed historic building now known as St Stephen's Church.

For a full discussion, see the entry under The African Theatre

Return to

Return to South African Theatre/Terminology and Thematic Entries

Return to South African Theatre Venues, Companies, Societies, etc

Return to The ESAT Entries

Return to Main Page