Popular theatre - Revision history

Centaps at 05:32, 14 September 2010

2010-09-14T05:32:47Z

Centaps at 05:31, 14 September 2010

2010-09-14T05:31:33Z

Centaps at 05:06, 13 September 2010

2010-09-13T05:06:01Z

Centaps: Created page with " Popular theatre. This term has had two distinct uses in South Africa during the late 20th century. (1) In its conventional sense it was long used to refer to theatre which is p..."

2010-09-13T05:05:00Z

Created page with " Popular theatre. This term has had two distinct uses in South Africa during the late 20th century. (1) In its conventional sense it was long used to refer to theatre which is p..."

New page

Popular theatre. This term has had two distinct uses in South Africa during the late 20th century. (1) In its conventional sense it was long used to refer to theatre which is popular with audiences, i.e. well supported at the box office. These were usually light and entertaining productions (comedies, farces, musicals, and so on), but could (and did) on occasion include more serious work (e.g. P.G. du Plessis’s Siener in die Suburbs was a very popular play in the 1970’s, breaking box office records for PACT). (2) However in the late 1970s to mid 1980s there was a serious attempt by some of the writers and theorists of the cultural struggle to appropriate this term and to use it as a term for “theatre for the masses”, i.e. “people’s theatre”. They based based on the Latin root of the word, namely populus, meaning “the populace”, and argued that it must refer to the entire population, not just the privileged (white) masses. Though much debated and specifically used in this sense by some writers (e.g. Robert Kavanagh and Ian Steadman), the inherent contradiction (and a need for the original term by most commentators on theatre) eventually proved too much and by the 1990s this politicised sense of the term had all but disappeared from everyday use. (See also People’s theatre.) Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Themes|South African Theatre Terminology and Thematic Entries]]

Return to [[Main Page]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 (1) In its conventional sense it was long used to refer to theatre which is popular with audiences, i.e. well supported at the box office. These were usually light and  entertaining productions (comedies, farces, musicals, and so on), but could (and did) on occasion include more serious work (e.g. P.G. du Plessis’s Siener in die Suburbs was a very popular play in the 1970’s, breaking box office records for PACT).
-(2) However in the late 1970s to mid 1980s there was a serious attempt by some of the writers and theorists of the cultural struggle to appropriate this term and  to use it as a term for “theatre for the masses”, i.e. “people’s theatre”. They based based on the Latin root of the word, namely populus, meaning “the populace”, and argued that it must refer to the entire population, not just the privileged (white) masses. Though much debated and specifically used in this sense by some writers (e.g. Robert Kavanagh and Ian Steadman), the inherent contradiction (and a need for the original term by most commentators on theatre)  eventually proved too much and by the 1990s this politicised sense of the term had all but disappeared from everyday use.   (See also  [[People’s theatre]].)
+(2) However in the late 1970s to mid 1980s there was a serious attempt by some of the writers and theorists of the cultural struggle to appropriate this term and  to use it as a term for “theatre for the masses”, i.e. “people’s theatre”. They based based on the Latin root of the word, namely populus, meaning “the populace”, and argued that it must refer to the entire population, not just the privileged (white) masses. Though much debated and specifically used in this sense by some writers (e.g. Robert Kavanagh and Ian Steadman), the inherent contradiction (and a need for the original term by most commentators on theatre)  eventually proved too much and by the 1990s this politicised sense of the term had all but disappeared from everyday use.   (See also  [[People's theatre]].)
 (3) In the 1990s the term became increasingly used anthropologically to also refer to what were considered to be the original indigenous forms of performance. Thus social, cultural and other oral and kinetic forms would be referred to as "popular theatre" or "popular performance". Particularly by researchers looking at African performance.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 13 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	This term has had three distinct uses in South Africa during the late 20th century.

−	~~Popular theatre. This term has had two distinct uses in South Africa during the late 20th century.~~ (1) In its conventional sense it was long used to refer to theatre which is popular with audiences, i.e. well supported at the box office. These were usually light and entertaining productions (comedies, farces, musicals, and so on), but could (and did) on occasion include more serious work (e.g. P.G. du Plessis’s Siener in die Suburbs was a very popular play in the 1970’s, breaking box office records for PACT). (2) However in the late 1970s to mid 1980s there was a serious attempt by some of the writers and theorists of the cultural struggle to appropriate this term and to use it as a term for “theatre for the masses”, i.e. “people’s theatre”. They based based on the Latin root of the word, namely populus, meaning “the populace”, and argued that it must refer to the entire population, not just the privileged (white) masses. Though much debated and specifically used in this sense by some writers (e.g. Robert Kavanagh and Ian Steadman), the inherent contradiction (and a need for the original term by most commentators on theatre) eventually proved too much and by the 1990s this politicised sense of the term had all but disappeared from everyday use. (See also People’s theatre.) Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Themes\|South African Theatre Terminology and Thematic Entries]]	+	(1) In its conventional sense it was long used to refer to theatre which is popular with audiences, i.e. well supported at the box office. These were usually light and entertaining productions (comedies, farces, musicals, and so on), but could (and did) on occasion include more serious work (e.g. P.G. du Plessis’s Siener in die Suburbs was a very popular play in the 1970’s, breaking box office records for PACT).
		+
		+	(2) However in the late 1970s to mid 1980s there was a serious attempt by some of the writers and theorists of the cultural struggle to appropriate this term and to use it as a term for “theatre for the masses”, i.e. “people’s theatre”. They based based on the Latin root of the word, namely populus, meaning “the populace”, and argued that it must refer to the entire population, not just the privileged (white) masses. Though much debated and specifically used in this sense by some writers (e.g. Robert Kavanagh and Ian Steadman), the inherent contradiction (and a need for the original term by most commentators on theatre) eventually proved too much and by the 1990s this politicised sense of the term had all but disappeared from everyday use.
		+
		+	(See also People’s theatre.) Return to [[South_African_Theatre/Themes\|South African Theatre Terminology and Thematic Entries]]

	Return to [[Main Page]]		Return to [[Main Page]]