Banning order - Revision history

Satj at 07:53, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T07:53:37Z

Satj at 07:47, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T07:47:20Z

Satj at 07:45, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T07:45:56Z

Satj at 07:39, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T07:39:47Z

Satj at 07:39, 6 March 2017

2017-03-06T07:39:07Z

Satj: Created page with "A banning order was an administrative tool utilized by the South African government to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an indivi..."

2017-03-06T07:25:07Z

Created page with "A banning order was an administrative tool utilized by the South African government to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an indivi..."

New page

A banning order was

an administrative tool utilized by the South African government to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an individual person’s freedom of travel, association, and speech. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of banning publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African Censorship Board, and the banning of organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised by the issuing of so-called “banning orders” on individuals. During the apartheid years, especially in the later, more violent years of the armed struggle, banning orders (with varying conditions) were imposed on numerous individuals who were perceived as a threat to the state, and this could mean anything from prohibition from attending meetings, to limitation to a certain regional area or house arrest.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]]   publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised  by the issuing of so-called "[[banning order|banning orders]]" on individuals.
-The opposite of '''[[banning]]''' is usually found as '''[[unbanning]]''' in the sources.
+The opposite of '''[[banning]]''' is usually found as '''[[unbanning]]''' in the sources. Related verbs: to [[ban]], to [[unban]].
 See also [[Censorship]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 In general legal terms [[banning]] is defined as an administrative tool utilized to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an individual person’s freedom of travel, association, and speech.
-In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]]  publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised  by the issuing of so-called "[[banning order|banning orders]]" on individuals.
+In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]]   publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised  by the issuing of so-called "[[banning order|banning orders]]" on individuals.
-The opposite of banning is usually found as '''[[unbanning]]''' in the literature.
+The opposite of '''[[banning]]''' is usually found as '''[[unbanning]]''' in the sources.
 See also [[Censorship]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, 6 March 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]] publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised by the issuing of so-called "[[banning order\|banning orders]]" on individuals.		In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]] publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised by the issuing of so-called "[[banning order\|banning orders]]" on individuals.
		+
		+	The opposite of banning is usually found as '''[[unbanning]]''' in the literature.

	See also [[Censorship]]		See also [[Censorship]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 In general legal terms [[banning]] is defined as an administrative tool utilized to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an individual person’s freedom of travel, association, and speech.
-In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]]  publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised  by the issuing of so-called "[[banning orders]]" on individuals.
+In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]]  publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised  by the issuing of so-called "[[banning order|banning orders]]" on individuals.
 See also [[Censorship]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 6 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	A banning order was	+	A [[banning order]] was a form of restriction imposed on individuals who were perceived as a threat to the state, and this could mean anything from prohibition from attending meetings, to limitation to a certain regional area or house arrest.

		+	In general legal terms [[banning]] is defined as an administrative tool utilized to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an individual person’s freedom of travel, association, and speech.

−	~~an administrative tool utilized by the~~ South ~~African government to outlaw and suppress publications, organizations, or assemblies, or restrict an individual person’s freedom~~ of ~~travel, association, and speech~~. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of banning publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African Censorship Board, and the banning of organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised by the issuing of so-called ~~“banning orders”~~ on individuals. ~~During the apartheid years, especially in the later, more violent years of the armed struggle,~~ banning ~~orders~~ (~~with varying conditions~~) ~~were imposed on numerous individuals who were perceived as a threat~~ to ~~the state,~~ and ~~this could mean anything from prohibition from attending meetings,~~ to ~~limitation~~ to ~~a certain regional area or house arrest.~~	+	In South Africa this took on a number of forms. Besides wide use of the familiar censorship practice of [[banning]] publications, performances and films (i.e. disallowing sales, performance or showing of such material in a particular country) by the South African [[Censorship Board]], and the banning of meetings, organizations and political parties, another pervasive form of control and suppression of opposition and dissidence was exercised by the issuing of so-called "[[banning orders]]" on individuals.
		+
		+	See also [[Censorship]]
		+
		+	== Sources ==
		+
		+	https://global.britannica.com/topic/banning-South-African-law
		+
		+	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ban_(law)
		+
		+
		+	Go to [[ESAT Bibliography]]
		+
		+	== Return to ==
		+
		+	Return to [[The South African Context/General Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
		+
		+	Return to [[South African Theatre/Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
		+
		+	Return to [[South African Film /Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
		+
		+	Return to [[South African Media/Terminology and Thematic Entries]]
		+
		+	Return to [[The ESAT Entries]]
		+
		+	Return to [[Main Page]]
		+
		+